Trump Demands 2-3% Rate Cut: Is Powell Under Pressure?

The Latest from Truth Social
Donald Trump has once again taken aim at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, blasting his refusal to cut interest rates in a recent post on Truth Social. “Too late, sir,” he declared, accusing the Fed of standing still while Europe cuts rates ten times. His message? A 2–3 percentage point reduction is not just needed—it’s urgent.
For context: U.S. rates remain near 5.5%, while several European central banks have already begun easing cycles amid lower inflation and softer growth.
Why This Matters Now
Trump isn’t just throwing darts—he’s tapping into a growing sentiment: that prolonged high rates are choking economic momentum. He claims annual savings of $80 billion if rates drop by 2–3%. That might sound like magic money, but let’s unpack it.
At current levels, a 2% cut would reduce borrowing costs across mortgages, business loans, and consumer credit—potentially boosting spending and investment. But timing matters deeply.
The Data Doesn’t Lie (Yet)
Inflation is indeed cooling—core PCE ticked down to 2.8%, close to the Fed’s 2% target. Yet labor markets remain tight; unemployment sits at a low 3.9%. These aren’t signs of an economy ready for aggressive easing.
As one of those analysts who’ve spent years modeling monetary policy impacts using Python scripts in London labs, I’ll say this plainly: We’re not in crisis mode—but we’re not far from it either.
The Fed isn’t blind to public pressure; they’ve signaled possible cuts as early as June—with cautious optimism.
The Political Wildcard
Let’s be honest: Trump doesn’t care about technical models or data lags—he cares about perception and power narratives. His calls for rate cuts are less about economics than about positioning himself as pro-growth versus a ‘dysfunctional’ central bank.
But here’s where my INTJ brain kicks in: when politicians demand drastic moves without evidence-based frameworks, you get policy whiplash—and that hurts long-term confidence more than short-term gains ever help.
Think back to 2018: when Trump pushed aggressively for cuts during strong growth? Result? Volatility spike after rate hikes resumed later that year.
What Should We Watch?
euro-crypto investors know well how sensitive markets are to expectations—and interest rate signals are among the most volatile drivers out there. So yes, we should monitor every Fed statement closely—but don’t confuse noise with signal. If inflation reaccelerates even slightly next quarter (hello CPI reports), Powell may pause—or even reverse course. That’s why I keep my charts updated with real-time macro indicators—not tweets from former presidents!
Final Thought: Calm Before the Storm?
cutting through emotion and hyperbole… there’s logic beneath all this noise. If inflation stays subdued and growth shows signs of deceleration by Q3, then yes—a gradual rate reduction will make sense—even if politically uncomfortable right now. But rushing ahead risks undoing years of disinflation progress—and could spark another round of financial instability in crypto markets or bond yields, despite any short-term boost to equities.
TheCryptoPundit
Hot comment (3)

ترامب يطلب خفض الفائدة؟ يا جماعة! باول ما زاله يشرب قهوه وحده، والسوق الأوروبي كله نايم! ترمب بيدوره مثل السيف، لكن باول عنده مخطط أطول من عودة القهوة… حتى الـ CPI راحل وبيقول “خلّصوا الحقيقة”! شو رأيكم؟ هل نزلنا الـ 2% ولا نخليها؟ اكتبوا تعليق قبل ما تروحون العودة!

ทรัมป์กับดอกเบี้ย: เรียกร้องแบบไม่ต้องคิด
เห็นทวีตของทรัมป์แล้วนึกถึงพ่อค้าขายข้าวเหนียวหมูบดในตลาดนัดเลยครับ—แค่สั่งลดราคาทันทีโดยไม่ดูต้นทุน! 🤡
เขาเรียกร้องให้เฟดลดดอกเบี้ย 2–3% เพราะเห็นยุโรปทำไปแล้วหลายรอบ…แต่ลืมไปว่าเศรษฐกิจสหรัฐฯไม่ได้เป็นเหมือนไทยนะครับ!
อินฟเลชันค่อยๆลด…แต่มือแรงงานยังแน่น!
อัตราการว่างงานอยู่ที่ 3.9% — เหมือนคนมาซื้อข้าวสวยตอนเช้าไม่มีใครรอเลย! 😅
ถ้าเราหักดอกเบี้ยตอนนี้โดยไม่มีข้อมูลชัดเจน…คงเหมือนถอนเงินจากบัญชีเด็กเล็กเพื่อซื้อกาแฟให้พ่อแม่!
INTJ ก็แอบกลัวนะ…
ผมก็เป็นคนประเภทวางแผนล่วงหน้า (INTJ) เช่นกัน — การเปลี่ยนแปลงนโยบายแบบฉับพลัน = ‘Whiplash’ และเคยเห็นผลในปี 2018 มาแล้ว…พอปรับขึ้นใหม่ ก็เกิดความผันผวนสุดๆ!
สังเกตให้ดี…อย่าหลงคำพูด!
อย่าเผลอเชื่อทวีตของอดีตประธานาธิบดีแค่เพราะเสียงดัง — เขาอยากเป็น ‘ฮีโร่เศรษฐกิจ’ เสียมากกว่าจะรู้จริง 😂
สรุป: พูดง่ายๆ ก็คือ…อย่าเพิ่งกด “โอนเงิน” ก่อนเช็กยอดเงินในบัญชี! 你们咋看?评论区开战啦!

Trump grita por cortes de juros como se fosse um novo Cristóvão Colombo da economia… mas o Fed nem sequer olhou para trás! 💸
Se ele pensa que $80 bilhões vão cair do céu com um ‘click’, está mais perdido que um NFT em 2018.
Eu analiso dados com Python e ainda assim digo: calma lá, presidente! O mercado não é só emoção — é lógica.
Quem aqui já comprou uma ideia política como se fosse uma cripto barata? 🤔 Vamos debater no comentário!
Bitcoin’s 31.41% Q2 Surge: When the Algorithm Smiles—And What We Forgot to Code in Web3’s Soul
Bitcoin Rebounds Past $108K as Geo-Political Tensions Shift Market Dynamics — A Silent Analyst’s Take on June’s Crypto Crossroads
Why Are U.S. Public Companies Rushing Into Bitcoin and Solana? The Hidden Signals Behind the 0.06 ETH/BTC Ratio Breakout
Strategy’s Real Edge Isn’t Leverage—It’s Arbitrage
Bitcoin on the Mortgage Radar: How U.S. Housing Giants Are Poised to Accept Crypto as Collateral
Bitcoin Inflow-Outflow Ratio Remains Strong: What This Signals for the Market
Bitcoin’s Bullish Momentum: GENIUS Bill Advances, Powell Rules Out July Rate Cut, and Institutions Stack BTC
Whale Watching: How Bitcoin's Big Players Are Accumulating During Market Dips
From Beijing to Bitcoin: How a Philosopher's Leap to Singapore Reflects Crypto's Future
Bitcoin Supply Squeeze: Corporate Buyers Snatch 12,400 BTC as Mining Output Dwindles to 3,150
- Why Opulous (OPUL) Price Stalled at $0.0447 Despite 52% Spike — A冷静Analysis of DeFi Liquidity and Market AnomaliesAs a crypto analyst with 12 years in the trenches, I’ve seen patterns like this before: a price frozen at $0.0447 while volume surges and volatility spikes — yet no real breakout occurs. This isn’t hype. It’s structural. Here’s what the data quietly reveals about OPUL’s liquidity trap, exchange rate decay, and why the bull market failed its own algorithm.
- When FedMeets Smart Contracts: The Quiet Collapse of Opulous (OPUL) in 2024As a Wall Street-trained crypto analyst with a PhD in Financial Engineering, I’ve watched Opulous (OPUL) defy meme-driven chaos. Its price stabilized near $0.0447 amid erratic volatility—trading volume spiked to 756K while exchange rates shifted unnaturally. This isn’t randomness. It’s algorithmic signaling. Here’s what the on-chain data reveals about real macro pressure—and why DeFi fundamentals are quietly rewriting the rules.
- Opulous (OPUL) Price Surge: A Closer Look at the Volatility and Trading Signals Behind the 1-Hour Crypto SwingAs a seasoned crypto analyst with a decade in fintech, I've tracked Opulous (OPUL)'s erratic 1-hour price swings—rising 52.55% in one snapshot while trading volume spiked to over 756K. This isn't noise; it's a signal. The data reveals coordinated liquidity manipulation, not organic demand. Here’s what institutional players aren’t telling you—and why your portfolio should care.
- 3 Underestimated Layer2 Protocols Revealing Hidden Volatility Patterns in Opulous (OPUL) TradingAs a Cambridge-trained crypto analyst, I’ve dissected 4 rapid snapshots of OPUL — and what’s unfolding isn’t noise. It’s a quiet pattern: price stagnation masked by inflated volume. The real story isn't in the candlesticks — it's in the mismatch between trading volume and换手率. This isn't speculation. It's math.
- Why Did 90% of Opulous (OPUL) Meme Coins Crash After a Sudden 1-Hour Spike?As a London-born analyst raised in a multicultural household, I’ve watched Opulous (OPUL) surge and collapse within hours—not because of hype, but because of invisible structural fragility. In this deep dive, I reveal how blockchain metrics, not sentiment, drove its freefall: volume spikes without price foundation. This isn’t gambling. It’s governance failure disguised as innovation.
- Why Opulous (OPUL) Just Surged 52.55% in 1 Hour — A Quantitative Deep Dive from Wall StreetAs a CFA-certified blockchain quant analyst at the intersection of DeFi and algorithmic trading, I’ve tracked OPUL’s wild 52.55% spike in just one hour. The data doesn’t lie: volume surged, liquidity shifted, but price clung to prior resistance levels. This isn’t noise—it’s a signal. Here’s what the models saw before the crowd did.
- When美联储遇上了智能合约:Opulous的2024黑天鹅预警与DeFi底层逻辑As a Brooklyn-based crypto analyst with a Wall Street mindset, I’ve tracked Opulous (OPUL)’s erratic price swings through four critical snapshots. Despite static prices, trading volume and exchange rates reveal a hidden pattern: liquidity manipulation disguised as volatility. This isn’t meme noise—it’s DeFi mechanics at work. Here’s what the charts won’t tell you.
- Why I Lost $10K—and Found My Voice in the Silent Code of OpulousIn the quiet hours between market swings, I watched Opulous (OPUL) dance on-chain—its price trembling like snowfall over a fractured ledger. What I lost wasn’t money. It was the illusion of control. This is not speculation. It’s a civilizational experiment: when algorithms speak, and we choose silence over noise. Here, data doesn’t lie—it whispers back.
- 3 Underestimated Layer2 Protocols | Are You Still Missing ETH's Hidden Liquidity红利?As a Wall Street rebel with a Columbia finance edge, I’ve tracked Opulous (OPUL)’s wild price swings—$0.0447 to $0.0449 in hours, trading volume spiking to 756K, and换手率 surging past 8%. This isn’t noise. It’s liquidity shifting beneath the surface. If you’re not watching Layer2 protocols like OPUL, you’re leaving real alpha on the table. Here’s what the charts won’t tell you.
- Opulous (OPUL) Price Surge: A Quiet Oracle’s Analysis of Volatility, Volume, and the Illusion of HypeAs a Quiet Oracle who trusts data over hype, I watched Opulous (OPUL) flicker between 0.0389 and 0.0449 USD—each price swing a silent signal in a market drowning in noise. The trading volume spiked to 756K, yet the price reverted—a classic pattern of false momentum. This isn’t volatility; it’s structure. I don’t chase trends. I decode chains.










