Solana's June Battleground: Pumpfun ICO, Terminal Wars, and the Rise of Launchpad Titans

The Unraveling of Solana’s Meme Engine
Let’s cut through the noise: Solana’s meme coin market isn’t dead — it’s evolving. Since my April analysis, we’ve seen a clear pivot from chaotic speculation toward structured platforms. The daily trading pattern remains telling: volume spikes between 10–11 UTC, peaking at 15–20 UTC — coinciding with U.S. daytime markets. This isn’t random; it’s behavioral economics on chain.
The real story? Infrastructure has replaced bots as the battlefield.
Pumpfun ICO: Hype Meets Hypothesis
Pumpfun is no longer just a launchpad — it’s becoming an event horizon. With plans for a \(10B fundraising round (FDV \)40B), complete token release at launch, and KYC-backed access via top CEXs, this is institutional-grade chaos.
I’ll be blunt: if executed well, Pump Token could hit \(100–\)200B FDV. That puts it in elite territory — near HYPE, above ENA. But here’s the catch: liquidity will bleed from existing “war zones” temporarily.
Still, with ~10% expected to be air-dropped? That’s not just marketing — it’s wealth redistribution via code.
Terminal Wars: Where Distribution Beats UX
Axiom now commands 61% of terminal share — not because it’s fastest or most accurate, but because it reaches. Its $137M in cumulative fees isn’t magic; it’s network effects powered by social virality.
Photon (9.9%), BullX (5.8%), GMGN (6.8%) — they’re fighting hard but losing ground. The lesson? In crypto infrastructure, distribution trumps engineering every time.
Even Bloom and Bonkbot hold relevance among niche users; new entrants like Padre and Nova are quietly gaining traction.
This isn’t about tech superiority anymore — it’s about who controls the attention funnel.
Launchpads Under Fire: From Hype to High Stakes
April saw @believeapp and @launchcoin surge into view as contenders in the meme capital race. But by June? Market share is retreating fast.
Enter LetsBonk.fun — where \(USELESS (\)140M mcap) thrives under Bonk community backing. It might be small-scale compared to Pumpfun’s empire (over 7 million tokens created), but its focus on curated projects gives it edge in trust.
And then there’s Believe.app — whose “Internet Capital Markets” model attempts to shift focus from pure memes to utility-driven launches via Twitter sniping limits and creator holding incentives. It failed to scale… yet still captured attention through controversy around founder @pasternak.
click here → [Believe App Screener by @0x_ultra]
even Raydium Launch Lab isn’t independent; many top tokens are launched via LetsBonk first before Raydium executes liquidity pools behind the scenes.
turns out execution ≠ ownership in this game anymore.
ColdChartist
Hot comment (5)

Solana ซื้อเหรียญทำไม? ตอนกลางคืนนั่งดูกราฟ… ฉันกลัวใจว่า “มันไม่ใช่เงิน” แต่มันคือความฝันที่ขายหุ้นให้ผีต! Pumpfun พุ่งขึ้นไป $200B? เหมือนคนซื้อขนมจีบแล้วบอกว่า “เดี๋ยังไม่พร้อม”! เหรียญพวกนี้ไม่ใช่ของเล่น — มันคือการปฏิบัติธรรมในยุคดิจิตอล! #ใครก็หลอนบ้างไหม? #แชร์ลิงกับฉัน

Solana June เดือดกว่ามวยไทย
พี่เขียนว่ามีการเปลี่ยนแปลงจากความโกลาหลมาเป็นโครงสร้าง — เรียกอีกอย่างว่า ‘พิธีกรรมเดิมพัน’ ก็ได้!
Pumpfun ไม่ใช่แค่ Launchpad
แต่เป็น ‘เหตุการณ์บิกแบงค์’! มูลค่าตลาด $40B พร้อมแจกของฟรีให้ผู้เล่น ~10% ถ้าเกิดขึ้นจริง… เทียบได้กับรวยแบบพระเอกหนังฮอลลีวูดเลยนะครับ
Terminal Wars: เจ้าไหนมีคนเยอะสุด?
Axiom ครองใจไปแล้ว 61% เพราะไม่ใช่เรื่องเร็วหรือแม่น…แต่มัน ‘ไวรัล’ เหมือนเด็กๆในตลาดหัวข้อไหนก็ตามที่คนเยอะ ส่งผลให้มูลค่ารวมเกิน $137M
Launchpad พ่ายแพ้? เปล่า!
Believe.app พลิกเกมด้วย controversy และ Twitter sniping แต่ LetsBonk.fun ก็ยังเจ๋งด้วยความเชื่อมั่นจากชุมชน Bonk สุดท้าย… การทำกำไรไม่ใช่เรื่องเทคโนโลยี — เป็นเรื่องของ ‘ใครควบคุมสายตา’
แล้วคุณเลือกฝ่ายไหน? คอมเมนต์มาเถอะ! 🚀

Solana這場 meme 大戰根本是現實版《頭文字D》啊~
Pumpfun一出,$10B募資直接炸裂,空投像發紅包一樣灑,誰不想要那10%?
Axiom憑著社羣病毒殺出重圍,61%市佔率不是靠快,是靠會『傳』!
連Raydium都得先讓Let’sBonk開路才敢進場…誰執行、誰擁有?笑死,這遊戲根本在玩『注意力』。
你們覺得下一個Launchpad會不會變成『超商兌換點』?留言猜猜看~ 💬

جون کے مہینے میں سولانا پر ایک نئی جنگ شروع ہوئی، جہاں بات چھوٹے کوئنز کے بجائے ‘لینچ پڈز’ اور ‘ٹرمینل وارز’ کی ہے۔
پمپ فن کا $10 بلین فنڈ رائزمنٹ؟ میرا خواب تو نہیں لگتا، لیکن سب کچھ تو خود بنانے والوں کا بس نہیں۔
اور اگر آپ سمجھتے ہیں کہ صرف تکنالوجی جیتے گی، تو پھر اکثر تجربات دکھاتے ہیں: توجہ حاصل کرنے والوں کو ہمیشہ فتح ملتی ہے!
تو آج آپ کو قدرتِ مند لوگوں میں شامل کرنا چاہتے ہو؟ تو بتائیں — آپ ‘بُونک’ وائلڈ اسٹائل میں لڑنا پسند کرتے ہو؟ 😂
#سولانا #مائم_کوائن #پمپفن

So Solana’s meme engine just turned into a crypto TED Talk? I’ve seen bots win wars… but now they’re billing me for \(200B? My grandmother’s tea is still more liquid than my portfolio. If you think Pumpfun’s \)140M mcap is ‘small-scale’, then you haven’t been to the launchpad — you’ve been reached. Click here → [Believe App Screener]… or just admit your losses. Wait — did someone say ‘KYC-backed access’? Nah. It’s behavioral economics on chain. And yes — I’m still laughing.
Bitcoin’s 31.41% Q2 Surge: When the Algorithm Smiles—And What We Forgot to Code in Web3’s Soul
Bitcoin Rebounds Past $108K as Geo-Political Tensions Shift Market Dynamics — A Silent Analyst’s Take on June’s Crypto Crossroads
Why Are U.S. Public Companies Rushing Into Bitcoin and Solana? The Hidden Signals Behind the 0.06 ETH/BTC Ratio Breakout
Strategy’s Real Edge Isn’t Leverage—It’s Arbitrage
Bitcoin on the Mortgage Radar: How U.S. Housing Giants Are Poised to Accept Crypto as Collateral
Bitcoin Inflow-Outflow Ratio Remains Strong: What This Signals for the Market
Bitcoin’s Bullish Momentum: GENIUS Bill Advances, Powell Rules Out July Rate Cut, and Institutions Stack BTC
Whale Watching: How Bitcoin's Big Players Are Accumulating During Market Dips
From Beijing to Bitcoin: How a Philosopher's Leap to Singapore Reflects Crypto's Future
Bitcoin Supply Squeeze: Corporate Buyers Snatch 12,400 BTC as Mining Output Dwindles to 3,150
- Why Opulous (OPUL) Price Stalled at $0.0447 Despite 52% Spike — A冷静Analysis of DeFi Liquidity and Market AnomaliesAs a crypto analyst with 12 years in the trenches, I’ve seen patterns like this before: a price frozen at $0.0447 while volume surges and volatility spikes — yet no real breakout occurs. This isn’t hype. It’s structural. Here’s what the data quietly reveals about OPUL’s liquidity trap, exchange rate decay, and why the bull market failed its own algorithm.
- When FedMeets Smart Contracts: The Quiet Collapse of Opulous (OPUL) in 2024As a Wall Street-trained crypto analyst with a PhD in Financial Engineering, I’ve watched Opulous (OPUL) defy meme-driven chaos. Its price stabilized near $0.0447 amid erratic volatility—trading volume spiked to 756K while exchange rates shifted unnaturally. This isn’t randomness. It’s algorithmic signaling. Here’s what the on-chain data reveals about real macro pressure—and why DeFi fundamentals are quietly rewriting the rules.
- Opulous (OPUL) Price Surge: A Closer Look at the Volatility and Trading Signals Behind the 1-Hour Crypto SwingAs a seasoned crypto analyst with a decade in fintech, I've tracked Opulous (OPUL)'s erratic 1-hour price swings—rising 52.55% in one snapshot while trading volume spiked to over 756K. This isn't noise; it's a signal. The data reveals coordinated liquidity manipulation, not organic demand. Here’s what institutional players aren’t telling you—and why your portfolio should care.
- 3 Underestimated Layer2 Protocols Revealing Hidden Volatility Patterns in Opulous (OPUL) TradingAs a Cambridge-trained crypto analyst, I’ve dissected 4 rapid snapshots of OPUL — and what’s unfolding isn’t noise. It’s a quiet pattern: price stagnation masked by inflated volume. The real story isn't in the candlesticks — it's in the mismatch between trading volume and换手率. This isn't speculation. It's math.
- Why Did 90% of Opulous (OPUL) Meme Coins Crash After a Sudden 1-Hour Spike?As a London-born analyst raised in a multicultural household, I’ve watched Opulous (OPUL) surge and collapse within hours—not because of hype, but because of invisible structural fragility. In this deep dive, I reveal how blockchain metrics, not sentiment, drove its freefall: volume spikes without price foundation. This isn’t gambling. It’s governance failure disguised as innovation.
- Why Opulous (OPUL) Just Surged 52.55% in 1 Hour — A Quantitative Deep Dive from Wall StreetAs a CFA-certified blockchain quant analyst at the intersection of DeFi and algorithmic trading, I’ve tracked OPUL’s wild 52.55% spike in just one hour. The data doesn’t lie: volume surged, liquidity shifted, but price clung to prior resistance levels. This isn’t noise—it’s a signal. Here’s what the models saw before the crowd did.
- When美联储遇上了智能合约:Opulous的2024黑天鹅预警与DeFi底层逻辑As a Brooklyn-based crypto analyst with a Wall Street mindset, I’ve tracked Opulous (OPUL)’s erratic price swings through four critical snapshots. Despite static prices, trading volume and exchange rates reveal a hidden pattern: liquidity manipulation disguised as volatility. This isn’t meme noise—it’s DeFi mechanics at work. Here’s what the charts won’t tell you.
- Why I Lost $10K—and Found My Voice in the Silent Code of OpulousIn the quiet hours between market swings, I watched Opulous (OPUL) dance on-chain—its price trembling like snowfall over a fractured ledger. What I lost wasn’t money. It was the illusion of control. This is not speculation. It’s a civilizational experiment: when algorithms speak, and we choose silence over noise. Here, data doesn’t lie—it whispers back.
- 3 Underestimated Layer2 Protocols | Are You Still Missing ETH's Hidden Liquidity红利?As a Wall Street rebel with a Columbia finance edge, I’ve tracked Opulous (OPUL)’s wild price swings—$0.0447 to $0.0449 in hours, trading volume spiking to 756K, and换手率 surging past 8%. This isn’t noise. It’s liquidity shifting beneath the surface. If you’re not watching Layer2 protocols like OPUL, you’re leaving real alpha on the table. Here’s what the charts won’t tell you.
- Opulous (OPUL) Price Surge: A Quiet Oracle’s Analysis of Volatility, Volume, and the Illusion of HypeAs a Quiet Oracle who trusts data over hype, I watched Opulous (OPUL) flicker between 0.0389 and 0.0449 USD—each price swing a silent signal in a market drowning in noise. The trading volume spiked to 756K, yet the price reverted—a classic pattern of false momentum. This isn’t volatility; it’s structure. I don’t chase trends. I decode chains.










